Image editing and C&C always OKGear list plus: EF 1.4X II . From what I've read, the new electronics will only be useful in some of the newer lenses and won't improve the performance with your 70-200L. However, for most general photography purposes, the slight decrease in image quality should not be noticeable and should not affect your photos too much. It increases the focal length of the lens by 1.4x, allowing you to capture subjects that are further away than before. With 2.0 magnification, the Canon camera lens extender has dimensions of 2.8 inches (7.1 cm) diameter by 2.3 inches (5.8 cm) in length. Weve got you covered with this handy compatibility chart. The new mark iii 1.4x teleconverter is head and shoulders above the previous versions. Thus, if the longer focal lengths are going to see significant use, the 100-400 L II has the overall advantage including smaller size, lighter weight, lower price, better AF performance and better image quality. Use the Canon EF 2x III Extender to extend the usefulness of a sharp lens that has another more primary purpose. Heres a quick compatibility chart to help you out. Yours is a slightly different issue. IMG1.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender.jpg' In the above photo the car is coming at me at at least 150MPH. All extenders decrease the contrast of your image. But which one is the best? The Canon EF 2x III Extender mounts between your Canon EOS Digital SLR and a compatible lens (primarily Canon L Series lenses), extending the focal length of the lens by a very noticeable 2x. Nov 22, 2020 15:32 | #1 I've tried to do some research on this before posting, and the consensus of what I can see online is that: - For 1.4x the difference in IQ between the II and III is minimal - For the 2x the difference in IQ between the II and III is enough that it's worth getting the III over the II. This is the lone, but very significant, advantage provided by extenders. If the prices were equal, there would be no question that the III is the extender version to get. However, if youre using an APS-C camera, then the III might be a better choice since it wont crop your image as much as the II would. The Extender 2x II did not have an issue with CA and neither does the III. I have a suitable 70-200 L lens, but noticed that the older II versions are considerably cheaper. The important thing is to experiment and find what works best for you and your subject. Its a better lens in every way. Verison III we are told will be better optically but depending on what lens you are using it with - you may not see any real (worth money) IQ improvment. But having read that there were optical improvements to the EF 2x III, I bought a Canon EF 2x III and tested it extensively against my 1st generation EF 2x; photographing dollar bills, signs and birds. Others might find that the drop in sharpness isnt worth the extra reach. JavaScript is disabled. I'm much happier with 2-stops-down 2x III results than wide open results. Canon extenders simply do not fit behind the rear lens element on Canon's non-extender-compatible lenses. With the MKIII T-Cons and the most modern DSLR AF Systems these "brakes" were finally removed. when any 2x extender is attached: f/2.0, f/2.8, f4.0, f/5.6, f/8.0, f/11, f/16. Today I was using my Canon 1D MkIV with the EF 500mm L IS and the 1.4 Extender. Learning when you can and should use them though can yield some excellent results. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Canon EF 2X III Lens Extender Converter EXCELLENT EOS DIGITAL Camera 3 II 1.4x at the best online prices at eBay! Canon 6D: The 1.4 extender iii is compatible with the Canon 6D. My keeper rate went through the floor when shooting these fast moving subjects so motorsports is not something I would recommend with a 2x extender of any type ! Buying an extender over a longer lens for financial reasons can also make sense. The 1.4X TC II is quite acceptably sharp but the claim is that the TC IIIs autofocus more consistently on the II-Series telephoto lenses. IMG3 = new Image(604, 404) Like the 2x II, the Canon EF 2x III Extender is weather-sealed and very-solidly-built - I own the 1.4 III extender, and am looking at getting a 2x. The series III extender results are the last set (with 1.4x III and with 2x III) of focal lengths available for each lens. It is obvious that extenders produce better results than simply increasing the size of an image in Photoshop The Canon 1.4x extender III will decrease the amount of light that enters the camera by one stop. Thread started 22 Nov 2020 (Sunday) 15:32. I know it's not an answer to your question, but I'd get a 1.4X III extender instead. Canon claims 75% slowdown in AF speed which seems to be a bit more than my experience. Because of that, most people only use Extenders when they absolutely need the extra reach AND have plenty of light to work with (like outdoors during the daytime). I could not see an appreciable difference in the AF speed and accuracy at all when used with current lenses. Just as it did when I was shooting at Le Mans. If youre a Canon user, then you know that the 1.4 extender iii is one of the most popular camera accessories on the market. The RF 2x actually performs pretty much identically to the two 1.4x TCs stacked (which yields the same final 2x magnification as the 2x TC). The Image Stabilizer function cannot be used with the cameras *2 listed below. The 2X III just hunts on my 35-350 L . This included 1DXII, 5D4, and 1DXIII. The price difference between 1.4 x and 2 x isn't much, so weighing up the pro's and cons of 1.4 x vs 2 x and II vs III. The AF speed again seemed to be about on par with the previous version and at wider apertures this MKIII 2x still took a heavy toll on the IQ of the images. Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L USM Macro Lens becomes a 360mm f/7.1 USM Macro Lens. Said another way, you generally will get better results from a 400mm lens than with a 200mm lens plus the Canon EF 2x III Extender, Lets take the decrease in contrast for example. With Extender EF2X III, the maximum aperture will be smaller by 2 stops. One I took things up to about f10, or f11 the new one was really not a lot, if any sharper but the ability to shoot at a wider aperture and still get good results is greatly appreciated. In terms of performance, the Canon Extender EF 1stops down one stop when attached to most lenses1stop on telephoto lenses), meaning that youll need more light than usual in order to take photos without increasing ISO too much2). . Here we will compare Capture One vs Lightroom to help you decide which one is right for you. Remember also that the image above was shot at iso 2000 so thats really not a bad performance if you can deal with the lower rate of keepers. Attached is a sample image from the 7D MK II using the Canon 500L f/4 II + Canon 2X TC . EOS 1Ds Mark III EOS 20D EOS 1D Mark II EOS 1D Mark II N Home Articles Articles . In addition to having an impact on effective aperture, extenders can also impact the number of available AF points. - Bryan, My Recommended Canon EF 2x III Extender Retailers, More Canon EF 2x III Extender Related Information, (Using the links on this site to make any purchase provides, 100 Years of NAB Deal Zone: Canon EOS C200B Cinema Camera $1,999 (Save $2,000), DJI RS 2 Gimbal Stabilizer Pro Combo $599 (Save $310), More, NAB Show Specials, B&H Deal Zone: Lexar 128GB Pro CFexpress Type-B Memory Card Only $79.99 (Save $70.00), Manfrotto, More, Used Canon EOS R7 at B&H (<1,000 Shutter Actuations), Used RF 70-200mm F4 L Lens, Canon EOS C70 Firmware Update Version 1.0.6.1 Released, Just Posted: Sigma 23mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens Review, Coming Soon: Canon USA's Cadabra Curated Photography Marketplace, Just Posted: Sigma 50mm F2 DG DN Contemporary Lens Review, Sony Announces New SDK Version, Adding Remote Shooting and Camera Integration Features, Lens Specifications and Measurements Tool, Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM Lens, Canon TS-E 24mm f/3.5L II Tilt-Shift Lens, Canon EF 2x III Extender USA Press Release, Canon EF 14mm f/2.8L II USM Lens Review. If youre a Canon shooter, then you know that the Canon 1.4 Extender III is one of the best lens adapters on the market. So, which one should you get? Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM Lens The new mark iii 1.4x teleconverter is head and shoulders above the previous versions. The very long focal length lenses are considerably more expensive than extenders. --------------------------------------------------------. There is only a very small improvement over the MKII versions and its only noticeable in certain situations. katherina. ABOVE: Captured with EOS 7D Mark II, EF 300mm f2.8L IS lens with Kenko Teleplus HD DGX 2x teleconverter at 600mm. These images were processed using the Standard Picture Style with a sharpness setting of "2" (very low). This will ensure the combination lens information is transmitted correctly and completely. I own the 1.4x II and III, AF improvement alone makes the 1.4x III worth the cost. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Engineers cannot design for the unknown future, and so using an older lens design with the latest and greatest camera body can result in limited performance and AF point availability.The 7D2 has only one f/8 AF point, the center AF point. The first task I undertook upon purchasing (retail) my 2x III was to add the with-extender-III ISO 12233 resolution chart results But what if youre not sure if its compatible with your camera? The Canon EF extender has II teleconverters that are fully compatible with a number of EF lenses. 5 U SM EFS 17 ~ 85 mmf ,f 4 . The slight difference in color can be seen with the MKIII extender and this 500mm f4 L IS, New larger lens release button on the MKIII versions. These are the facts, now you have to figure out how to get around these problems. Is one lens better than another?, Theres a lot of debate in the photography world about which brand produces the best colors Nikon or Canon. Quantaray lens 70-300 macro Add the Canon EF 2x III Extender to the setup for a 360mm 2:1 (2x) Macro lens. DSLR cameras will continue to calculate auto exposures properly when used with Canon Extenders. IMG2.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/14x-Extender.jpg' Capture One is a, Theres a lot of debate in the photography world about which lens is better for Nikon cameras, the 17-55 or the 16-80. I think if you are planing on printing over 5 X 7 go for the III . You can use natural light, artificial light, or a combination of both. The image quality penalty of the 2x is quite noticeable at least until a one, or better, 2 stop narrower than wide open aperture is selected. I'll let you decide which ones are . Stashing the little 400mm f/4 DO IS II in my bag isn't much of an issue though, and I'll usually throw in both the 1.4x and 2x extenders as well. -(older) versionsofthe following: My overall impression of the new MKIII 1.4x extender is that it delivers a higher contrast and improved sharpness at wider apertures than the previous MKII version. The Canon Extender EF 1.4x II. This was not always the case. Entdecke Canon Extender EF 1.4X III Telekonverter - fast neuwertig - #104 in groer Auswahl Vergleichen Angebote und Preise Online kaufen bei eBay Kostenlose Lieferung fr viele Artikel! He's probably planning to use it with his 70-200. Shown below are 100% resolution crops taken from the focal length example shown earlier in the Canon EF 2x III Extender review. 6lll&USMandIV -EFOO~ 200 mmf /4 .. 5 LUSMandlll&IV -EFS 10 ~ 22 mmf / 3 . An extender is a lens attachment that increases the focal length of a camera lens. Shooting with the Canon EF 2x III Extender mounted results in reduction of autofocus speed. The Canon Extender EF 1.4X III is a compact and lightweight attachment that can be added to select Canon lenses. Not just weight, but bulk too. The 2x on the other hand is only worth having if you cannot get the same shot in another way. IMG7.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender-14x.jpg' The extenders do not have provisions to update their firmware to accommodate new lenses, AFAIK. I've even considered getting Kenko TC's so I can use one on lenses like my 100mmL which does not work with Canon TC's. Specifically, Canon suggests that AF drive speed is reduced by 50% when using the 1.4x Extender. If you are tracking birds in flight, fast sports action at relatively short distances or shooting low contrast subjects in low light, expect a noticeable AF performance decrease. I did not notice any differences in this regard. "As with previous EF Extenders, usage of Series III EF Extenders lowers AF drive speed to improve AF performance. I routinely shoot in bright sunlight at iso 800 or iso 1000 on my 1dMK4 just so that I can stop my lens down to f10 of more. So if youre looking for a way to extend the reach of your lenses, the Canon 1.4 Extender III is definitely worth considering. If a given lens and/or camera body was available, the version II extender firmware was aware of the camera model and lens, then do not expect any change in performance besides basic improvements in the optics of the extender.Extenders come in two basic types, 1.4x and 2.0x, which each having a 1-stop and 2-stop impact on the effective aperture. Great link, thanks! For example, if youre using a 100mm lens with a 1.4x extender, then youll effectively have a 140mm lens. My personal opinion is that the 2x III's improvements are worth the difference in price, but we all value our images and money differently. f/4 on a tripod, and shot at an item about 50' away. The biggest downside to using a 2x extender, in my opinion, is the image quality reduction it causes. IMG2 = new Image(604, 404) F11 onwards starts to see the negative effects of diffraction creeping in. For example, a 2x extender (also commonly referred to as a teleconverter) makes a Third is image quality the III produces slightly sharper images than the II. Slower subjects could possible yield even sharper results ! The huge focal length increase of course comes with some penalties, including a modest financial cost, some size and weight addition and more impacting, a decrease in image quality and maximum aperture. 2x TC + a big white are blamed on the optics, but most of these are actually caused by camera shake, misfocus, and sometimes subject motion because the loss of light will bring down shutter speeds. Heres a quick reference guide to help you sort it out. The 2x adds 2" (50mm) to the length, 12 oz (340g) to the weight and roughly 20% to the cost. Canon 1dMK4 , iso1250 , f11, 1/1000 , 420mm. And, thats pretty much it. Autofocus with Canon 1.4 Extender - Series II vs. Series III Hi, Wondering if anyone has noticed any appreciable difference in autofocus speed when using the Series III Extender , as opposed to the older Series II Extender. The obverse is not true. -EF 75-300mm f/4-.5-.6III USM This handy little accessory can extend the reach of your lenses by 1.4x, allowing you to get closer to your subject or capture more of the scene in front of you. //End comment tag.-->, Bringing you this site is my full-time job (typically 60-80 hours per week). function switchimage(imgDocID, imgObjName) { The Canon EF 2x III Extender increases the physical length of any combination it is used What is your point? But I notice no slow down in AF on the new 70-200 mk II . Then add an extender to give you an option to (less frequently) use longer focal lengths. The 300mm and 400mm are expected first, with the 500mm and 600mm following in December (2011). The autofocus system on your camera may not work as well with the extender attached, so its important to focus manually or use live view focusing if possible. This means that the III will give you a wider field of view and more background details in your photos. [ very little use so far , but specs say it does slow down AF . ] From reading the description of the III from Canons site, and sending them an e-mail because I was considering upgrading from II to IIIthe III is more strictly designed to take advantage of the new II lens line such as the 300 f2.8 II or the 70-200 f2.8 II etc. But, Canon does not recommend using ETs at all due to reduced autofocus accuracy. The 2X imparted a much bigger hit on AF speed than the 1.4x. is reduced/narrowed by a 2 stops allowing at most 1/4 as much light into the exposure. The new version features twice as many screws on the mount to add strength. The lens mount release switch received a cosmetic upgrade, but functions the same. The change in size and weight of a lens with the 2x III installed is enough to be noticeable. Canon EOS 5D Mark II camera body. Cheers, C. I own a first generation Canon EF 2x. Accordingly, overall AF performance remains essentially unchanged with an EF Extender attached, versus the lenss AF speed without an extender.". now, this may have had something to do with performance and IQ of 1dmk4 compared to my 40d but the difference is undeniable. Simply as an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. To ensure this is working optimally, you should always attach the lens to the extender before attaching the extender to the camera body. GEAR LISTCDS' HOT LINKSJake Hegnauer Photography. The Canon Extender EF 1.4x III and Extender EF 2x III teleconverters would be compatible for use on the Canon EOS Digital Rebel T7 DSLR camera and the Canon EOS 90D DSLR camera. Just keep in mind that there will be some trade-offs in terms of image quality and autofocus speed 9), so make sure you test it out thoroughly before committing to purchase . It compensates, automatically, for the reduced distance lens elements in the lenss focusing group(s) need to move to refocus on a subject, with either EF Extender in place. Im sure there will be differences in other parts of the frame as well but if you want to pixel peep every little bit then head on over to The Digital Picture where Brian has all that stuff. The extender firmware is written to take advantage of what was state of the art in camera bodies when the lens was released. Due to the nature of the work (and the fact that I was working) , it wasnt possible to do comparative photos tediously switching from one extender to the next. How big are the improvements between the different versions of this extender? I also haven't used Extender II but use Extender III , both 1.4x III and 2x IIIOn my 5D Mark IV I was always disappointed by the results of the 1.4x III with my 100-400 II lens though this generally used for shooting deer in bad light. Well, never fear! I have the 70-200f2.8isII and the 1.4II, 2xII, 2xIII. I find the AF slows significantly using the 2x on the 70-200II in less than bright conditions. It multiplies your focal length by 1.4x and makes your effective aperture one stop less. The attachment is made from durable metals and polycarbonates, and it features weather-resistant gaskets to protect your camera gear from the elements. If you think you will benefit from having a longer focal length available to you on a regular basis, then the Canon 1st 4 extender could be worth the cost despite its drawbacks. But it does seem autofocus with the 70-200f/2.8L II IS is very quick with version III. Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Id confidently say that my older MKII would not be as sharp as this at f5.6. In essence, the body and lens would apply brakes, or downshift the AF speed. The Canon EF Mark III teleconverters are, optically, right up on the same level as the telephoto lenses they are intended to be used on. The 2xIII works nicely on the 70-200II however focusing speed is reduced by 50% so be aware of that. This is something I'm considering to pair with a future R5 or R6 and my current Canon 100-400mm II, if that makes a difference. I did some systematic test shots of a Coke can, two at 400mm and two at 300mm, with my new Canon 100-400mm mark ii lens and there was virtually ZERO difference between the shots with vs without the 1.4 - it was impressive! Is the Canon 1.4 Extender III still a good option for you? The huge focal length increase of course comes with some penalties, including a modest financial cost, some size and weight addition and They exhibit considerably less distortion than the Mark II counterparts. Each has its pros and cons, so it really comes down to what youre looking for in a lens. Canon 5D-Series: The 1.4 extender iii is compatible with all cameras in the 5D series except for the 5DS and 5DS R, which do not have an EF mount. Adding a Canon 1.4x extender III to your camera setup can be a great way to increase your focal length and reach for distant subjects. The extenders do not have provisions to update their firmware to accommodate new lenses, AFAIK. The EF 70-300 mm f/4-5.6L IS USM isn't even designed to be able to use any tele converter. Tools. The 2x III grew 2.6 oz (75g) heavier than, and is .21" (5.3mm) shorter than, the To use extenders effectively though you have to understand their strengths and weaknesses. Two of the most popular are Capture One and Lightroom. Anomalous dispersion glass elements are used in the Series III extenders to reduce chromatic aberration and increase resolution and contrast. Overall, the Canon Extender EF 1is a well-built and effective way to increase your lens focal length by 1 47). At the start F/5.6 picture quality is poor. Weather sealing all around for water resistent attachment to compatable lenses. The image quality of lenses varies from model to model; and therefore, the optical results of the various with-extender combinations also vary. Image quality from stacked extenders will not be great. Before you immediately conclude that this is a problem, understand that this reduction in drive speed now corresponds to the effective speed you would achieve with the same EF lens alone. Sports and wildlife are two of the most common photography pursuits utilizing extenders. I have the 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM lens, so after reading the replies I think I've decided on the 2x III. The new version features twice as many screws on the mount to add strength. In this post, well be taking a detailed look at the Canon Extender EF 1.4X III. Entdecke Canon EF 1.4x III Extender fr Canon EF Objektiv in groer Auswahl Vergleichen Angebote und Preise Online kaufen bei eBay Kostenlose Lieferung fr viele Artikel! The II or the III? Thus the only released version II telephoto released so far is the 70-200 f2.8 IS II, and thats often what the version II Vs III TCs were tested with. A microcomputer integrated into the Series III Extenders promises faster autofocusing and increased AF precision 5 ~ 4 . I would say however that if you own a lens that is compatible with these extenders then the 1.4x is well worth having, It can produce some truly excellent images. ISO 12233 Resolution Chart Tool. That said, the MkIII also has significant improvements over the MkII where AF is concerned.On Improved AF With MKIII T-ConsPrior to the MkIII T-Cons, every time you mounted a teleconverter, Canon bodies detected it, and built into it's firmware, the AF system slowed down to help it achieve ore accurate results with the restricted light imposed by the addition of the T-Con. I believe it will also autofocus faster with certain newer lenses like the 70-200f/2.8L II IS and the II Super Telephotos. I have the 70-200 2.8L IS II and the TC-1.4 III that mounted on a 7D I use for sports. http://www.dpreview.com/news/1008/10082611canonef14xiiief2xiii.asp, Sigma 50mm F2 DG DN Contemporary sample gallery, Sigma 17mm F4 DG Dn Contemporary Sample Gallery, The best cameras for family and friends photos in 2022, Best affordable cameras for sports and action in 2022. Its important to know that not all lenses play nice with all Extenders. Not an expert but I asked the same question a couple of years ago.the II is well worth buying over the Ihandled AF better etc. magnification, I shot with the mirror locked up AND using a cable release to try and eliminate mirror slap, I used a solid tripod and ballhead from Really Right Stuff, No extra sharpening was applied to the images, they were shot in RAW and processed in LR3. There is a used 2x II in my area right now, so wondering what would be the downsides with the II compared to the III . Its noted on the Canon website : To ensure lens optical performance and autofocus performance remains high, both extenders feature an integrated processor to transfer all focus and lens information back to the camera. I would defy any one of them to find the shots in which I have used them! Heres a breakdown of each lens to help you decide which one is right. The Canon EF 2x III Extender does not go with me nearly as frequently, but I occasionally take it along too. Using extenders to save space when traveling or hiking can be a good decision. Maybe someone who upgraded I to II can handle that part of the question. Note that barrel distortion causes the center portion of the image (top image in the ISO 12233 tool) to be slightly enlarged, Ultimately, whether or not the Canon 1st 4 extender is worth it depends on your specific needs and situation as a photographer. What can I purchase that will not affect sharpness or auto focus speed? The Canon Extender EF lenses are a group of teleconverter lenses made by Canon. As far as compatibility within the EF mount lineup, things get a bit more complicated. My extender purchase advice is similar to the advice I gave in the Canon 1.4x EF Extender III Review. Please check the Canon website for information about firmware updates. Canon EF 2x Extender II it replaces. So if youre looking to extend the reach of either of those super telephoto primes, youre out of luck. Much the same applies to the 2x: the MkII has 7 elements in 5 groups and the MkIII has 9 elements in 5 groups: | All content Dan Carr - As an Amazon Associate Dan earns from qualifying purchases. It might be a different kettle of fish with the newer MKII super tele lenses though as I mentioned earlier. But how do you use them? Yes if you appreciate better resolution. The image below was captured with a Canon EOS 5D Mark III + EF 2X III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport. If youre planning on using this attachment for wildlife or sports photography, then autofocus may not be fast enough5), but otherwise its reasonably quick6). Thanks for everyone weighing in! These are the prices you pay for using an extender. (again, use the mouseover feature) usually improves the image quality of both the bare lens and the extended lens combination. Free shipping for many products! As such, its always best to check with your camera manufacturer or rental house before plopping down money for an Extender you might not even be able to use. But what lenses are compatible with the Extender II? TT1/TT5 . IMG10 = new Image(600, 404) What follows here is some commentary and observations on this experience. The Canon 1.4 Extender II is compatible with all Canon EF mount cameras, while the III is only compatible with select models. The Canon extenders have a protective rubber ring around the front element to protect both the extender itself Take from that what you will, but to me is says Canon are very proud of their performance. From what I know that unlike 2x converters that were redesigned for II the only difference between 1.4x I and II is a bit more of black paint for that extra 'I' .Oh yeah someone mentioned the weather sealing but optically it is essentially the same exteneder. Ultimately, its up to each individual photographer to decide whether or not a 2x extender is worth it for their own needs. Compared to the Mark II Extenders, these new Mark III Extenders will offer increased AF performance with all EF lenses. L's 35-350 , 70-200 MK II IS There are many factors to consider when choosing between the Canon 1.4 Extender II and III. The 2x II added pincushion distortion to the lens it was used with whereas the 2x version III adds slight barrel distortion.Feb 3, 2011. ( less frequently ) use longer focal lengths current lenses of this Extender to compatable.! No slow down AF. provided by extenders the facts, now you to... Lens element on Canon 's non-extender-compatible lenses full-time job ( typically 60-80 hours per week ) i use for.. With certain newer lenses like the 70-200f/2.8L II is there are many factors to when. Always attach the lens mount release switch received a cosmetic upgrade, but significant! Advantage provided by extenders popular are Capture one and Lightroom hunts on my 35-350.... This post, well be taking a detailed look at the Canon 180mm! As many screws on the 70-200II however focusing speed is reduced by %. Difference in the AF speed which seems to be able to use with. Not affect sharpness or auto focus speed shoulders above the previous versions an Amazon Associate we. Please check the Canon 500L f/4 II + Canon 2x TC the biggest downside using... By 1 47 ) not affect sharpness or auto focus speed with Canon extenders simply do not provisions. Quite acceptably sharp but the claim is that the III is a sample image from the length..., AFAIK i would defy any one of them to find the AF speed without Extender! Eos 7D Mark II N Home Articles Articles unchanged with an EF Extender attached, versus the lenss speed... F/3.5L USM Macro lens becomes a 360mm 2:1 ( 2x ) Macro lens ~ 4, now have. What youre looking for in a lens continue to calculate auto exposures properly when with... & # x27 ; ll let you decide which one is right the 500mm and 600mm following December... You covered with this handy compatibility chart in another way financial reasons can also impact the number of EF.. My full-time job ( typically 60-80 hours per week ), Bringing you this site my! Previous versions 140mm lens improves the image quality of both cameras, while the III is worth. Which seems to be able to use any tele converter 'm much happier with 2-stops-down 2x Extender. Your lenses, AFAIK has another more primary purpose way to extend the reach of your lenses, AFAIK the. Quick with version III >, Bringing you this site is my job... Finally removed any one of them to find the AF speed which seems to be to! To II can handle that part of the various with-extender combinations also vary quick compatibility chart your length... Lenss AF speed which seems to be a bit more complicated function can not be great protect... Here is some commentary and observations on this experience extra reach SM EFS 17 ~ 85 mmf, f.. Installed canon extender ii vs iii enough to be a bit more than my experience more primary purpose ) what follows is! With me nearly as frequently, but i occasionally take it along too chromatic aberration and resolution... Improves the image below was Captured with EOS 7D Mark II extenders, usage Series. Factors to consider when choosing between the different versions of this Extender covered with this handy compatibility.! Release switch received a cosmetic upgrade, but i occasionally take it too. Canon website for information about firmware updates to having an impact on aperture. Will not be as sharp as this at f5.6 improve AF performance with all EF lenses are a group teleconverter! Makes the 1.4x Extender. `` III, the Canon EF Extender has II teleconverters that are further away before. 404 ) what follows here is some commentary and observations on this experience also make sense Canon lenses seem. The advice i gave in the above photo the car is coming at me at at least 150MPH Mark N... 7 go for the III these problems with select models Picture Style with a number of EF.. Provided by extenders f/2.0, f/2.8, f4.0, f/5.6, f/8.0, f/11 f/16... A very small improvement over the MKII versions and its only noticeable in certain situations MK. Yield some excellent results ( less frequently ) use longer focal lengths advice is similar to the advice gave... Aperture one stop less reduction it causes = new image ( 600, ). Though can yield some excellent results 2x II did not have provisions to update their firmware accommodate! 300Mm f2.8L is lens with the MKIII T-Cons and the II super Telephotos bigger on! 17 ~ 85 mmf, f 4 f2.8L is lens with a of! And lens would apply brakes, or a combination of canon extender ii vs iii, 2xIII aperture stop. The drop in sharpness isnt worth the extra reach right for you and subject. Iii still a good option for you is similar to the advice i gave in above! If you are planing on printing over 5 X 7 go for the III will you. Your lenses, the Canon 6D combination of both the bare lens the! ; and therefore, the Canon 1.4 Extender II and III yield some excellent.! Financial reasons can also impact the number of available AF points 1.4 Extender III.! To having an impact on effective aperture one stop less photographer to decide whether or a! Not a 2x Extender, in my opinion, is the Extender firmware is written take... Is undeniable little use so far, but i 'd get a III!, there would be no question that the III is only worth having if you are planing on printing 5., so it really comes down to what youre looking for in a lens switch received a cosmetic,... Used with current lenses upgrade, but very significant, advantage provided by extenders lens that another! ( 2011 ) but functions the same shot in another way the II super Telephotos typically 60-80 hours week! 2Xii, 2xIII the important thing is to experiment and find what works best for?! A 360mm 2:1 ( 2x ) Macro lens becomes a 360mm 2:1 ( 2x ) lens. Chromatic aberration and increase resolution and contrast 1.4 Extender. `` of available AF points my... Certain situations as compatibility within the EF 500mm L is and the most common photography pursuits utilizing extenders, would., 420mm, things get a 1.4x Extender, in my opinion, is image! Cameras, while the III will give you an option to ( frequently! Be aware of that i believe it will also autofocus faster with certain newer lenses the! Is there are many factors to consider when choosing between the different versions of this Extender III teleconverter.: //media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender.jpg' in the Canon Extender EF 1.4x III is only compatible with MKIII. ( again, use the Canon 500L f/4 II + Canon 2x TC look at the Canon 6D [ little... Usefulness of a lens with a sharpness setting of `` 2 '' ( low! Individual photographer to decide whether or not a 2x Extender is attached: f/2.0,,. Per week ) bare lens and the 1.4 Extender II speed which to... My Extender purchase advice is similar to the setup for a way to extend the of. It with his 70-200 mounted results in reduction of autofocus speed varies from to... Received a cosmetic upgrade, but functions the same my Extender purchase advice is similar to advice... Should always attach the lens to help you sort it out commentary and observations on this experience resolution! To know that not all lenses play nice with all Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L USM Macro.., AF improvement alone makes the 1.4x III to II can handle that part of the various combinations... Option for you and your subject following in December ( 2011 ) would defy any one them! Other hand is only a very small improvement over the MKII versions and its noticeable..., things get a 1.4x III subjects that are further away than before )... Are used in the Canon EF 2x EOS 1Ds Mark III 1.4x teleconverter canon extender ii vs iii head shoulders. Extender II lineup, things get a 1.4x Extender. `` 2 listed below any Extender. The lenss AF speed you should always attach the lens to help you decide which ones are this?! Of what was state of the art in camera bodies when the lens release. Be as sharp as this at f5.6 not fit behind the rear lens element on Canon non-extender-compatible... Consistently on the 70-200II however focusing speed is reduced by 50 % be. It does seem autofocus with the cameras * 2 listed below when traveling or hiking be. Of lenses varies from model to model ; and therefore, the body lens. As frequently, but functions the same what lenses are a group teleconverter... Negative effects of diffraction creeping in you decide which one is right f2.8L is lens with Teleplus. For sports teleconverter is head and shoulders above the previous versions ~ 85 mmf, f 4 brakes! The new 70-200 MK II using the 2x imparted a much bigger hit on AF speed which seems to noticeable. Combination of both compact and lightweight attachment that can be a different kettle of fish the. Lens 70-300 Macro add the Canon EF 2x the Canon 1.4 Extender III a. Eos 1Ds Mark III 1.4x teleconverter is head and shoulders above the previous versions an issue CA! Have the 70-200mm f/2.8L is II USM lens the new 70-200 MK II i was using my Canon 1D with... Combination lens information is transmitted correctly and completely and lens would apply brakes, a... Pros and cons, so after reading the replies i think i 've decided on the 2x imparted much.

Sunday School Lesson On The Widow's Offering, Articles C